In the lambda calculus a term is solvable iff it is operationally relevant. Solvable terms are a superset of the terms that convert to a final result called normal form. Unsolvable terms are operationally irrelevant and can be equated without loss of consistency. There is a definition of solvability for the lambda-value calculus, called v-solvability, but it is not synonymous with operational relevance, some lambda-value normal forms are unsolvable, and unsolvables cannot be consistently equated. We provide a definition of solvability for the lambda-value calculus that does capture operational relevance and such that a consistent proof-theory can be constructed where unsolvables are equated attending to the number of arguments they take (their "order" in the jargon). The intuition is that in lambda-value the different sequentialisations of a computation can be distinguished operationally. We prove a version of the Genericity Lemma stating that unsolvable terms are generic and can be replaced by arbitrary terms of equal or greater order.

Source : oai:arXiv.org:1604.08383

DOI : 10.2168/LMCS-12(2:12)2016

Volume: Volume 12, Issue 2

Published on: June 30, 2016

Submitted on: August 11, 2016

Keywords: Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science,F.4.1

This page has been seen 93 times.

This article's PDF has been downloaded 27 times.